Legal Opinion
Wiley v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 26, 1989No. 3-88-198-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHANNON, Chief Justice.
Marvin Wiley and John Malveaux, rela-tors, complain of Honorable Mary Pearl Williams, Judge of the 53rd District Court of Travis County. On June 23,1988, Judge Williams signed an order overruling a motion to compel production. Relators seek to have that order vacated by writ of mandamus. By overruling the motion to compel production, the district court necessarily concluded that the documents sought were exempt from disclosure. Because we agree with that conclusion, this Court will deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
On November 27, 1985, relators were working…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation v. Shippers Stevedoring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Curry v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.