Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Triborough Bridge And Tunnel Authority

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 16, 2021No. 1:19-cv-10478Unknown

1Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ss SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: _March 16, 202] _ MICHAEL ROSENBERG Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-10478 (ALC) TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUTHORITY D/B/A MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS, Defendant. ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: Plaintiff, Michael Rosenberg, brings this action pursuant to New York General Business Law 8§ 399-zzz and 349, alleging that Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (“TBTA”) charges an illegal $6 fee to send paper billing statements. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API