Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Franklin County v. Hester

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1932No. 8 Div. 341PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The purpose of this suit is to test the constitutionality of the Act of July 22, 1931. Acts, p. 604.

The title of that act purports to amend section 4% of the General Revenue Act of 1919, p. 284. No other feature of the act refers in terms to the Revenue Act of 1919. But it relates to the matter embraced in section 4% of the Revenue Act. That act created a trial tax of $3 in every case in the circuit court and directed its payment into the general funds of the state treasury. The act of 1931 re-enacts the provision for a trial tax fixing the same amount, but provides that one-half of it shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perry County v. Selma, Marion & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. State Ex Rel. Ward v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Kennamer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Bozeman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dearborn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Harris v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API