Legal Opinion

F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 14, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 14715PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiff herein moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The parties agree as to the facts, which are as follows: the plaintiff, a New York corporation, had an authorized capital of 200,000 shares of $12 noncumulative second preferred stock, without par value, having a stated value of $36.25 per share, and 6,500 shares of common stock, the par value of which was $100 per share. Prior to March 21,1951, there were, issued and outstanding, 100,-000 shares of the $12 noncumulative second preferred stock and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. National Sugar Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Empire Trust Co. v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. The F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. American Steel Foundries v. Ernest J. Sauber, District Director of Internal Revenue, Chicago, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Ram v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. McMahonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API