McNeil v. Finnegan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. The case is stated in the opinion. cited McCarthy v. Grace, 23 Minn. 182; Horton v. Williams, 21 Minn. 187; Goebel v. Hough, 26 Minn. 252; Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270. cited Fletcher v. Neudeck, 30 Minn. 125, and North Star Boot é Shoe Go. v. Ladd, 32 Minn. 381.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
Action to recover the value of personal property, alleged to have been converted by the defendant. The property had belonged to one Bodwell. Bodwell mortgaged it to the plaintiff, and the mortgage matured without payment of the mortgage debt. After-wards, the property being in the defendant’s possession, the plaintiff demanded that it be delivered to him, which defendant refused. The plaintiff’s right is that acquired by this mortgage. The defendant claims to have purchased the property from Bodwell subsequent to the mortgage, and in good faith. Upon the trial the plaintiff made…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Bank of Farmington v. EllisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wright v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- James v. PettisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Big Stone County Bank v. Crown Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Holt Motor Co. v. R. C. A. Photophone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.