Legal Opinion
Satschel, Inc. v. Wilson
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 8, 2024No. 4:23-cv-04159Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION SATSCHEL, INC., 4:23-CV-04159-CCT Plaintiff, □ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VS. DISMISS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT GREGORY WILSON, Defendant. Defendant Gregory Wilson moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) to dismiss Satschel, Inc.’s suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, alleging Satschel’s claims are not ripe for judicial review. Docket 16. Wilson also moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) for partial summary judgment on Satschel’s claim that Wilson failed to disclose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. City of Valley Park, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Nebraska Public Power District, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska v. Midamerican Energy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Public Water Supply District No. 10 of Cass County, Missouri v. City of Peculiar, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Mercantile Bank of Springfield v. Joplin Regional Stockyards, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
- Nichols v. MMIC InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014