Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 2013No. 1005303; A148910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Petitioners SAIF and Pioneer Waterproofing Co. Inc. (SAIF) seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), challenging the board’s conclusion that SAIF did not correctly calculate claimant’s temporary total disability (TTD) benefits when it failed to include in the calculation claimant’s additional “wages” of subsistence pay and one-time travel pay. As explained below, we agree with the board’s conclusion that claimant’s subsistence and travel pay are indeed “wages” for purposes of determining claimant’s TTD benefits under ORS 656.210(1) and OAR 436-060-0025(5)(c).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Baker v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Robert ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API