Legal Opinion

Yazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 2014No. 111502, 111643Published

1Opinion of the Court

KATUGER, J.;

1 This cause (Yazel 1) and its companion case No. 111,648 Ken Yasel, Tulsa County Assessor v. The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc., et al. (Yazel 2), involve the dispositive issue of whether. 68 0.8.2011 § 2880.1(D) 1 requires a county assessor to be represented by a district attorney or by the Oklahoma Tax Commission before an appeal from the Board of Equalization may proceed to the Courts. 'We hold that it does not. - 4

FACTS

12 The defendants/respondents, The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc. (Warren), and Montereau, Inc. (Monter-eau), {collectively…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Darnell v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API