Holsinger v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Claimant, Linda S. Holsinger, appeals from the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which denied her benefits because of willful misconduct.1 The Board determined that Claimant’s charges of sexual harassment against a physician/employer constituted willful misconduct because they were unsubstantiated, unreasonable and inimical to the best interests of the employer, Blair Medical Associates (Blair). We affirm. The pertinent facts are as follows.
Claimant worked for Blair from October 3, 1991 to September 17, 1993. She was warned about her job…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Horace W. Longacre, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Cundiff v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- BMY v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sonat Marine, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.