Gentry v. Gentry
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
This case presents the issue whether an agreement to divide future Social Security benefits can be enforced by the courts of Arkansas notwithstanding the provisions of federal law prohibiting the transfer or assignment of such benefits. After twenty-eight years of marriage, the appellant, Horace D. Gentry, and the appellee, Athanett O. Gentry, were divorced in 1984. They entered into a property settlement which was approved by the court and which included among its provisions the following paragraph nine:
In the event that the husband is entitled to Social Security…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. Dale R. EggenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- In Re the Marriage of AndersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mulder v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.