Legal Opinion
Patton v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 6, 2006No. 01-161 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This breaeh-of-contract matter is before the Court following a four-day trial held in *111Washington, D.C. Rule 52(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) governs “actions tried upon the facts,” and provides that findings of fact may be “based on oral or documentary evidence ... and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witness.” RCFC 52(a). In order to determine the facts surrounding the termination of plaintiffs contract by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Uniglobe General Trading & Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Barlovento, LLC v. AUI, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Hooker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007