Legal Opinion

Mace v. Boedker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 11, 1905PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court.- — ■ HoN. M. A. ROBERTS, Judge. ActioN at law to recover damages for a personal injury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeavee, J.

It appears without dispute that defendant is an Illinois corporation, and at tbe time of tbe accident in question was engaged in grading a line of railroad for tbe use of another corporation in Wapello county, Iowa. In tbe performance of this work, defendant constructed a temporary track along tbe line of tbe grade, and operated thereon trains of dump cars, moved by small engines, by which device tbe earth excavated from tbe cuts was transported and deposited upon tbe fills. To enable tbe trains to pass each other, switches and side tracks were made use of at convenient points upon tbe line.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Ellington v. Beaver Dam Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Schus v. Powers-Simpson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Sankey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Kline v. Minnesota Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lunde v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Cahill v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Duffey v. Consolidated Block Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API