Legal Opinion

Duffey v. Consolidated Block Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1910PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Appanoose District Court. — Hon. D. M. Anderson, Judge. This is au action for personal injuries. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

At the time of the injuries complained of the plaintiff was a coal miner and an employee of the defendant. The defendant was operating its mine in what is known in the record as the. “low coal” district. The coal vein in this region is thin, and the entries are correspondingly low, usually running less than five feet in height. On the day of the accident plaintiff was directed by the pit boss to engage temporarily in driving a mule in one of the entries, known in the record as the “first left entry.” That is to say, the cars were drawn by a mule, and the plaintiff was required to bring in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. Des Moines Edison Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Taylor v. Star Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Beresford v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Sankey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Ingebretsen v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Patrum v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. WessingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Hutchinson v. PlantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API