Legal Opinion
State v. Shady
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 5, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
This is a petition for a new trial in the ease of the same name reported in 100 Vt. 193, 136 Atl. 26. The petition is based upon the petitioner’s desire to bring onto the record the fact that at the time of the enactment of G. L. 6973 individually owned electric light and power plants were in operation in this State, so that he may make it appear that the statute referred to is unconstitutional for the reasons urged when the ease was here on exceptions. It would do him no good to succeed in this effort. The statute is not subject to the infirmities urged. Speaking broadly, it is the province…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In re Consolidated Rendering Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- Lawrence v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MessierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. GillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- State v. Gillard, Holland, JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013