Legal Opinion
Salahuddin v. Carlson
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 24, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-0224-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARRINER, District Judge.
Yusaf Lateef Na’im Salahuddin, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Petersburg, Virginia, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this Bivens -type action, seeking monetary, injunctive and declaratory relief for alleged violations of his constitutional rights. On 25 March 1981, defendants filed a motion to dismiss which the Court characterized as a motion for summary judgment. See order dated 21 April 1981. Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to respond to defendants’ motion. Defendants’ motion is now ripe for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- James E. Sweet v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Director William D. LeekeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Malik v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Thomas Eldridge Barrett v. Commonwealth of Virginia Arlington Circuit CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Salahuddin v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Azeez v. FairmanDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8958, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,643 Dawud Halisi Malik, A/K/A David W. Riggins v. Neal Brown, and Carol L. Moses, Assoc. Supt. Kathy Kaatz, C.U.S. Sue Kinsinger, C.P.M. Mark Crewson, C.U.S. Virginia Carter, Sgt. Joan Smith, Mail Rm. Personnel John Tice, Sgt. Dick Frank, Sgt. Nancy Hill, Corr. Officer Monica Sukert, Corr. Officer Richard Rooney, Corr. Officer John Fritzpatrick, Sgt. Marie Norman, Corr. Officer S. Giesenoff, C/o Cbcc Schouviller, Lt., Hearing Officer Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995