Legal Opinion
Hebah v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 17, 1972No. 325-69PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Curiam: In this extremely close case, we have concluded that plaintiff has not made a sufficient showing to *732convince us that we should disagree with the report of Trial Commissioner Joseph Y. Oolaianni, to whom this case was referred with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law.
The commissioner filed his opinion and report on June 28, 1971, and plaintiff has taken no proper exceptions to the facts found by the commissioner, except for those based on a coroner’s report. Under our rule, the commissioner’s findings of fact 'are presumed to be correct…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Maiorana v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Ballard v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kanter v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.