Legal Opinion

Patrick v. USA (TV1)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 1, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00179Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COREY BRUCE PATRICK, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos.: 3:17-cv-179-TAV-HBG ) 3:15-cr-63-TAV-HBG-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Corey Bruce Patrick has filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[Doc. 1].1 The government has responded [Doc. 8]. Because, based on the record before the Court, it plainly appears that Petitioner is not entitled to relief, it is not necessary to hold an evidentiary hearing,2 and his motion will be denied. I. BACKGROUND In April…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API