Legal Opinion

Evers v. Hologic, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 2025No. 1:22-cv-11895Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * IN RE BIOZORB DEVICE PRODUCTS * LIABILITY LITIGATION * * Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-11895-ADB This Order Relates To: * 1:23-cv-10579-ADB * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Before the Court is Defendant Hologic’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Beth Deuel’s claim that Hologic’s alleged failure to warn her breast-cancer surgeon about the risks associated with BioZorb, a radiographic marking device, caused her to suffer a variety of injuries. [ECF No. 67 (“Motion” or “Mot.”)].1 Deuel, as well as more than eighty other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Robert Brennan v. Roderick HendriganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API