Legal Opinion

Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Hockett

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 2001No. 00-1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Minnesota Power & Light Company (“MPL”) sued Michael Hockett in federal district court to enforce certain non-compete and non-disclosure agreements. The district court entered a preliminary injunction against Hockett, but eventually dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Hockett then filed a motion, with the district court for an award of attorneys’ fees under the injunction bond, relying upon Indiana law and based on MPL’s alleged bad faith. A magistrate judge recommended, and the district court agreed, that federal law governed and prohibited Hockett’s request for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Indiana GRQ, LLC v. American Guarantee and Liability Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  2. Ormsby v. Nexus RVs, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API