Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Bannon v. Henrich

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1941No. 34618Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

McG-ehee, J.,

delivered a dissenting opinion.

After careful study and consideration of the evidence contained in the voluminous record in this case, I am fully persuaded that the jury should have been permitted to decide the issue as to whether the alleged will here in controversy was procured by undue influence; that the peremptory instruction should not have been granted in favor of the appellee iii that behalf. A close personal and confidential relation was shown to have existed between Miss Henrich, the sole beneficiary thereof, and the testator. It is claimed on her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ham v. HamMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Post v. HaganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  4. Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Soper v. CiscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API