O'Bannon v. Henrich
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
McG-ehee, J.,
delivered a dissenting opinion.
After careful study and consideration of the evidence contained in the voluminous record in this case, I am fully persuaded that the jury should have been permitted to decide the issue as to whether the alleged will here in controversy was procured by undue influence; that the peremptory instruction should not have been granted in favor of the appellee iii that behalf. A close personal and confidential relation was shown to have existed between Miss Henrich, the sole beneficiary thereof, and the testator. It is claimed on her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Ham v. HamMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Post v. HaganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Soper v. CiscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.