Legal Opinion
Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 2018No. 337394PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, P.J.
*310 Defendant, the Midland County Board of Road Commissioners, appeals the trial court's denial *311 of its motion for summary disposition. Because plaintiff's presuit notice complied with the applicable statute, we affirm.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff, Tim E. Brugger II, was injured on April 27, 2013, when he lost control of his motorcycle and crashed. He filed suit against defendant, asserting that the crash was the result of large potholes and uneven pavement on a road maintained by the Midland County Road Commission. Governmental immunity does not shield a road commission from liability when it fails to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ryan Harston v. County of EatonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Estate of Brendon Pearce v. Eaton County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2021
- Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2021
- Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2021