Legal Opinion

Newitt v. Camden Drilling Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1977No. 1159PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for moneys due on a drilling contract brought by Camden Drilling Company. The defendant Louis A. Newitt contended that the original written contract was superseded in certain particulars by a subsequent oral contract. The jury answered special issues favoring defendant Newitt on his affirmative defense of novation. The trial court disregarded the findings of the jury however, and entered a judgment non obstante veredicto for Camden. It is from this judgment that Newitt appeals.

Newitt desired to lease a bay drilling barge for the purpose of drilling an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. DeenTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Texas Gas Utilities Company v. BarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McCane Sondock Detective Agency v. Penland Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Lassiter v. Boxwell Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. M.J. Sheridan & Son Co. v. Seminole Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Rowland v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Siderius, Inc. v. Wallace Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Miles v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API