Legal Opinion

Thruston v. Minke

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 3, 1870PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Allegany County, in Equity. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The appellee, Humbird, was made a party defendant, as being the mortgagee of the appellant for his undivided fourth part of the ground on which the hotel was erected, with other parts of the whole property, not demised to the appellee, Minke. Humbird never appeared.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol., C. J.

It appears from the record, that before the 24th day of October, 1867, the appellant and Frederick Minke, (the appellee,) were seized in fee as tenants in common, of a lot of ground in the town of Cumberland, on the north-west corner of Baltimore and George streets; the appellant owning one fourth, and Minke three-fourths thereof. The lot was improved by a three story building known and occupied as “St. [Nicholas Hotel.” The building was situated on the corner of the streets mentioned, leaving on the west thereof, a part of the lot fronting on Baltimore street, vacant or unimproved.

On the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  2. Amelung v. SeekampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1838

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Summers v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Halle v. NewboldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Newbold v. Peabody Heights Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Miller v. BAY CITY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API