In re Estrin

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent was admitted to the Bar at the Second Judicial *198Department in 1968. At all relevant times since then, he has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Department.

Respondent was one of five attorneys independently caught up in a scheme perpetrated by one Quigley who “facilitated” insurance settlements of personal injury claims. The other four attorneys were convicted of commercial bribing in the second degree, and received discipline ranging from public censure (Matter of Ingber, 239 AD2d 58) to suspension from practice for two years (Matter of…