Cowing v. Cowing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
In his complaint plaintiff alleges an express contract for work and labor performed as a farm hand at a specified wage, also alleges the reasonable worth and value of such services. There is a second cause of action set forth, for groceries and other eatables furnished to defendant’s household with his knowledge and acquiescence. The answer is a general denial.
There is ample evidence in the record to warrant a verdict either way, upon either cause of action. It is not contended but what plaintiff was at defendant’s farm for a year and that he performed a certain • amount of different kinds of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Unowsky v. ShowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Kath v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Petrich v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930