Legal Opinion

Cowing v. Cowing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 1925No. 24,337PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In his complaint plaintiff alleges an express contract for work and labor performed as a farm hand at a specified wage, also alleges the reasonable worth and value of such services. There is a second cause of action set forth, for groceries and other eatables furnished to defendant’s household with his knowledge and acquiescence. The answer is a general denial.

There is ample evidence in the record to warrant a verdict either way, upon either cause of action. It is not contended but what plaintiff was at defendant’s farm for a year and that he performed a certain • amount of different kinds of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Unowsky v. ShowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Kath v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Petrich v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API