Legal Opinion

Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1989No. C5-88-1825PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Respondent Eileen Kath sued appellant Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Burlington) for the wrongful death of her husband, Robert Kath. The jury found Burlington had been negligent under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. A. § 51 et seq. (1986) (FELA), and had violated the Federal Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 23 (1986). Burlington’s post-trial motions were denied and it appeals.

FACTS

The decedent, Robert Kath, in 1942, at the age of 18, began working for Northern Pacific, Burlington’s predecessor, as a laborer. For approximately two months,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Emmett E. Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. R. H. Fulton v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. W. Reid Wright, Bessie B. Wright and Reid Wright, Jr. v. Farmers Co-Op of Arkansas and OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Kinikin v. HeupelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hampton Bank v. River City Yachts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. OsborneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API