Legal Opinion

Sirianno v. New York RSA No. 3 Cellular Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted that part of defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in dismissing the first cause of action and in determining that the action is barred by the doctrine of laches. We otherwise conclude, however, that the court properly dismissed the remaining causes of action and denied that part of defendants’ motion seeking costs.

Plaintiff Peter J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. McBarnetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Victor Temporary Services v. SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dawn K. v. Lisa R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Patton v. Matusick, Spadafora & VerrastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. R & V Development, LLC v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Sirianno v. Town of Poland Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API