Legal Opinion

Li Fu v. Hong Fu

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 26, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

733 A.2d 1133 (1999)

160 N.J. 108

Li FU and Xiao Kang Su, wife & husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

Daniel Su, an Infant, by his parents and natural guardians, Li Fu and Xiao Kang Su, and Li Fu and Xiao Kang Su, Individually and Kuide Chen and Michelle Chen, an Infant, by her father and natural guardian, Kuide Chen and Kuide Chen, Individually, Plaintiffs,

v.

Hong FU, Defendant, and

Freedom River Inc., d/b/a Budget Rent-a-car of Philadelphia, its agents, servants and/or employees, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 4, 1999.

Decided July 26, 1999.

Benjamin N. Cittadino,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Kilberg v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API