Janie L. Haskins v. United States Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Janie Haskins appeals from the judgment of the district court denying her request for retroactive promotion, back pay, front pay and attorney’s fees in this Title VII sex discrimination suit. Appellant claims that the district court committed legal error by considering the issue of “but for” causation — i.e., whether appellant would have been promoted in the absence of discrimination — in the remedial stage of the proceedings. For the reasons which follow, we reject appellant’s arguments and affirm the district court.
I
Appellant was first employed by the United…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Carlyne TERBOVITZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FISCAL COURT OF ADAIR COUNTY, KENTUCKY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Liddle & Robinson v. Kidder Peabody & CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.