Legal Opinion

Richard Otto and Patricia Otto v. Catrow Law, PLLC

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2020No. 19-0361Separate

1Opinion of the Court

No. 19-0361 – Otto & Otto v. Catrow Law PLLC FILED November 2, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK Workman, Justice, dissenting: SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA In its order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment, the circuit court refused to credit the testimony of petitioners’ expert witness, an attorney based in College Park, Maryland, with more than forty-five years of relevant experience, on the ground that, [a]lthough the [petitioners] designated T. Summer Gwynn as a legal expert in this matter, he only provided a general synopsis of how he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hundley v. MartinezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Thornton v. CAMC, ETC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dye v. CorbinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Calvert v. ScharfWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Keister v. TalbottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API