Legal Opinion

Dye v. Corbin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1906PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Eitoi- to Circuit Court, Ritchie County. Action by T. E. Dye against M. L. Corbin. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cox, Judge:

On the 14th day of January, 1903, in the circuit court of Ritchie county, T. E. Dye instituted an action of trespass on the case for $10,000 damages against M. L. Corbin, a practicing physician of that county, for malpractice in the diagnosis and treatment of an injured ankle. Upon trial before a jury, and after the plaintiff had introduced all of his evidence, the defendant, without introducing any evidence, moved, the court to exclude plaintiff’s evidence, which motion being sustained, a verdict for defendant followed. ' Plaintiff moved to set aside the verdict, which motion was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ketterman v. Dry Fork Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Small v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Lawson v. ConawayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Kuhn v. BrownfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Roberts Ex Rel. Roberts v. GaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hundley v. MartinezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Totten v. AdongayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API