Legal Opinion

Finley v. Pafford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1937No. 4710PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The parties will carry here their trial court designation.

S. W. Calliham and Louise Calliham were husband and wife. -Both died, the husband first, and intestate. No children were born of their marriage. Mrs. Louise Calliham left a will, naming the defendants herein as the devisees of the property in controversy. Plaintiffs are the heirs of S. W. Calliham, deceased, being the sisters and the children of deceased brothers and sisters of S. W. Calliham, deceased. They filed this suit for an undivided one-half interest in two sections of land in Armstrong county, naming the above…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Parks v. CaudleTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Leahy v. TimonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Schmeltz v. GareyTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Bollinger v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Logan v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  3. Johnson v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Hudspeth v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Elizabeth Terry Duncan and the State National Bank of El Paso, Independent Executors of the Estate of Ernest Allen Duncan, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API