Bollinger v. Wright
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The main facts are stated in the opinion. The deed to the Jaekson-Street property was executed to Mourning E. Bollinger June 7, 1887, by a bargain-and-sale deed from Samuel Goldthwaite.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
to quiet title. Plaintiff recovered judgment. This appeal is by defendant from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The court found the allegations of the complaint to be true, which are to the effect that plaintiff is "the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the premises described, being a lot on Twenty-fifth Street in San Francisco; that defendant, as administrator of the estate of Mourning E. Bollinger, deceased, claims an estate or interest therein adverse to plaintiff; that .said claim is without right, and the said estate has no right nor title…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Poulson v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Dean v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by30 opinions
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Wahlefeld v. WahlefeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Killian v. KillianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.