Legal Opinion

Van Zile v. Norub Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Cornelius W. Van Zile and another, copartners doing business as the Van Zile Company, against the Norub Manufacturing- Company. Decree for plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATPIELaD, District Judge.

This cause of action is based upon the alleged infringement of a registered trade-mark and also an allegation of unfair competition. The defendant uses the word “Nodust” with the word “Lee’s” inclosed in a shield and bearing the word “trademark” (although this is not a registered trade-mark) as part of the design and reading matter, on a cylindrical shaped can, containing a green powder, to be used as a germicide and cleanser in sweeping.

The plaintiffs’ articles as marketed at present consist of pasteboard boxes' bearing the registered trade-mark of a shield…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. J. A. Scriven Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  3. John T. Dyer Quarry Co. v. Schuylkill Stone Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  2. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. v. Sargoy Bros.District Court, E.D. New York · 1921
  3. Kassman & Kessner, Inc. v. Rosenberg Bros.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  4. Edgar-Morgan Co. v. Alfocorn Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1921
  5. Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API