Legal Opinion

Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 26, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Bill by the Aunt Jemima Mills Company against Rigney & Co.

1Opinion of the Court

VEKDKR, District Judg-e.

This is a suit for infringement of a registered trade-mark and for unfair competition. It appears that the Davis Milling Company, a Missouri corporation engaged at St. Joseph in the manufacture and sale of various kinds of flour, adopted about"1890 the name “Aunt Jemima’s,” together with a fanciful picture of a colored woman, as a mark for its pancake flour. On April 3, 1906, a certificate of registration was granted, to it by the Patent-Office for this mark as a “trade-mark for self-rising flour.” in 1914 the Davis Milling Company was reorganized as the Aunt Jemima…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  3. Borden Ice Cream Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. British-American Tobacco Co. v. British-American Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Street & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeLong Hook & Eye Co. v. Hump Hairpin Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API