Legal Opinion
Chicago Housing Authority v. Stewart
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1969No. 40796PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Underwood
The sole question in this case is whether the plaintiff has given the defendant notification of reasons for the termination of his tenancy and an opportunity to reply to those reasons, as required by a regulation issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development', prior to giving him notice to vacate.
On January 31, 1958, the defendant entered into a month-to-month tenancy for an apartment in a federally assisted, low-rent housing project owned and operated by the Chicago Housing Authority. On January 17, 1967, the manager addressed to him the following communication:
"You are hereby…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chicago Housing Authority v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Stewart v. Chicago Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Chicago Housing Authority v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Dorothy Johnson v. Illinois Department of Public Aid and Peoria Housing Authority, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Housing Authority v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Pedro Escalera and Rose Escalera, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. New York City Housing Authority, Ira S. Robbins, Individually and as a Member of the New York City Housing Authority, Simeon Golar, Individually and as a Member of the New York City Housing Authority, and Albert A. Walsh, Individually and as a Member and Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, Rose Lee Rolle, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. New York City Housing Authority, Ira S. Robbins, Individually and as a Member of the New York City Housing Authority, Simeon Golar, Individually and as a Member of the New York City Housing Authority, and Albert A. Walsh, Individually and as a Member and Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, Walter Lockman and Viola Lockman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. New York City Housing Authority and William Walsh, Ira S. Robbins and Simeon Golar, Individually and in Their Capacities as a Member of the New York City Housing Authority, Clarence Humphrey, Phyllis Humphrey, and Fannie Haywood, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. New York City Housing Authority, Ira S. Robbins, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of the New York City Housing Authority, and Francis v. Madigan, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of the New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.