Commonwealth v. Zappacosta
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
Appellant was found guilty after jury trial of conspiracy,1 possession of instruments of crime,2 and burglary.3
*73The facts giving rise to appellant’s arrest and prosecution in Lancaster County present us with one novel question of law, surely one of first impression, but unfortunately, appellant has waived his right to make this argument before us. This question deals with the authority of federal officers to make an arrest for a state crime.
On June 10, 1976, during daylight hours, 13 FBI agents from the FBI office in Philadelphia, acting under the direction of Supervising Agent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CrockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. GrekisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.