Schneider v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The facts found by the jury and the findings of the trial court are sustained by the evidence and must stand. Upon the facts so found, Is respondent entitled to judgment against appellant herein? The indorsements upon the note are immaterial unless they were authorized by the defendant-appellant. Appellant contends that Attorney Smith, who represented the estate of Mr. Anderson in the probate proceedings, had no right to indorse payments upon the note after the death of Mr. Anderson. However, this contention is upon the assumption that the statute of limitations (sec. 330.19) had run during…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Accola v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Gillitzer v. DucharmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Waterproof Paper & Board Co. v. Van BurenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- National Bank v. CottonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Bowe v. La BuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.