Legal Opinion

Pullman v. Secord-Hopkins Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 6, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trespass on the Case changed to Assumpsit by amendment. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard W. Clifford, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

t

John P. Hopkins and Frederick H. Secord commenced an action on the ease against appellant October 26, 1891. On that day they filed a declaration, substantially as follows:

“John P. Hopkins and Frederick H. Secord complain of George M. Pullman, of a plea of trespass on the ease, and thereupon the said John P. Hopkins and Frederick H. Secord, by W. 0. Asay, their attorney, complain, for that whereas before and at the time of the committing of the grievances by the said defendant, as hereinafter mentioned, the said defendant was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb, Christy & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Fish v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Eylenfeldt v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maegerlein v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API