Legal Opinion

Dreka v. Whitehair

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 8, 1942Published

1Per curiam

On previous appeals it was held that the sworn bill of complaint herein, filed May 28, 1938, seeking an accounting and other relief, does not wholly fail to state a cause of action. Dreka, et al., v. Whitehair, et al., 140 Fla. 802, 192 So. 321; Dreka, et al., v. Whitehair, et al., 145 Fla. 102, 199 So. 579. See 5 Am. Jur. pp. 288, 293; Williams v. Bailey, 69 Fla. 225, 67 So. 877; Bolles v. O’Brien, 63 Fla. 342, 59 So. 133.

The general nature of the issues presented may be understood by referring to the quoted parts of the final decree and other portions of the record.

The prayer of the bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Bolles v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Dreka v. WhitehairSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Dreka v. WhitehairSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API