Legal Opinion

Hayes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1926No. 6 Div. 972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

This appellant was tried and convicted for the offense of wanton or malicious injury to an animal. The indictment charged that he unlawfully, wantonly, or maliciously killed, etc., a horse, the property of Griffin Johnson, etc.

The corpus delicti was proven without conflict or dispute, and the controlling question of course -vyas whether or not this defendant committed the unlawful act complained of in the indictment. On this material inquiry there was direct and also circumstantial evidence tending- to establish his guilty agency. On the other hand the defendant strenuously denied that he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  3. State v. BlueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Sanders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Gary v. WoodhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Floyd v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Newman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API