Ronca v. British & Foreign Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Appellant issued its policy of insurance to Ronca and De Franco, insuring for $3,000 a truck against fire and other hazards, the loss, if any, payable “as interest may appear to assured and Monroe Stauffer.” The truck described in the policy was destroyed by fire, and Stauffer, who held a “bailment” lease, entered judgment against Ronca and De Franco, on which an attachment was issued summoning appellant as garnishee. This was to recover $2,234.55, the balance of the truck’s purchase price, owed by Ronca and De Franco.
Ronca, in his own right and as assignee of De…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paxos v. Jarka CorporationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church of Franklin v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Thomas v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Bowers Co. v. London Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Damms v. Humboldt Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Minkin v. MinkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Frey v. U. T. Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Leland v. Firemen's InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Steinert v. GalassoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Willits v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.