Legal Opinion

Vineyard Land & Stock Co. v. Twin Falls Oakley Land & Water Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1917No. 2886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho ; Drank S. Dietrich, Judge. Suit by the Twin Falls Oakley Land & Water Company, a corporation, and another, against the Vineyard Land & Stock Company, a corporation, and another. From the decree, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

The defendants below are appealing. The Land & Water Company heretofore entered upon a project, under the Carey Act of Congress (Act Aug. 18, 1894, c. 301, § 4, 28 Stat. 422 [Comp. St. 1916, § 4685]), for acquiring and impounding water from Goose creek and its tributaries, and distributing it to users. Goose creek takes its rise in the state of Nevada, and crosses the state line into Idaho, and by the project the water is impounded ”in the latter state. In support of their water rights, the plaintiffs claim that they purchased certain rights from various users of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vineyard Land & Stock Co. v. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Burley Irr. Dist. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Gillespie v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  4. Rickard v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API