Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Bowden

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 18, 1997No. 94-9220PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, we affirm the district court’s entry of judgment for appellees Ralph Bowden and DeKalb County, Georgia, on appellant Phyllis Watkins’s constitutional claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

FACTS

On January 15, 1990, Phyllis Watkins, an African-American female, began work as an assistant solicitor (assistant) in the Office of the Solicitor of DeKalb County (the office). 1 Ralph Bowden, solicitor of the county, had hired Watkins the preceding week. Bowden informed Watkins, the only African-American lawyer in the office, that she was subject to a six month probationary period…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Busby v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Anthony Martin v. Susan DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API