Legal Opinion

United States v. Hyatt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 14, 1957No. 8978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

A general court-martial convicted the accused of desertion with the intent to shirk important service, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885, and sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for three years. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed. We granted review to consider the correctness of the law officer’s instruction that “as a matter of law, duty beyond the continental limits of the United States is important service.”

The Manual for Courts-Martial,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HempUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. ShullUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. BooneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. StablerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. MerrowUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. McKenzieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. HazardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. GainesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API