Legal Opinion

Behnke-Walker Business College v. Multnomah County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1943PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, C. J.

The question before us for decision is whether or not the real and personal property owned and used by the plaintiff, Behnke-Walker Business College, a corporation, is subject to taxation. The real property involved consists of two lots in Portland, on which there is a three-story brick and concrete building, one hundred by one hundred feet in size, especially designed and used for carrying on therein the plaintiff’s business, the conduct of “a school of the type commonly called a business college,” in which are taught “bookkeeping, shorthand, English, arithmetic, business administration and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Assessors of Boston v. Garland School of Home MakingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hibernian Benevolent Society v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Spillers v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Oregon Methodist Homes, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Methodist Book Concern v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. National College of Business v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API