Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Kathan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 26, 1956No. 12745_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 F.2d 54

98 U.S.App.D.C. 54

Dejon R. MAYBERRY, individually and as administratrix of the

Estate of Ray Richards, deceased, Appellant,

v.

Ruth B. R. KATHAN, and The Hearst Corporation, d/b/a Hearst

Newspapers, Washington Bureau, Appellees.

No. 12745.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 30, 1955.

Decided Jan. 26, 1956.

[98 U.S.App.D.C. 55] Mr. Wilton H. Wallace, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Henry F. Lerch and Richard Stetson, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Jackson Brodsky, Washington, D.C., for appellee Ruth B. R. Kathan.

Mr. William C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Thomson v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. Thorp v. RandazzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. Mayberry v. KathanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolle v. HumeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. McLaughlin v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API