Wernham v. Moore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Murphy, P.J.
Upon this motion to dismiss for legal insufficiency, the complaint must be deemed to allege whatever can be implied from its statements by fair intendment. If the plaintiff is entitled to recover in any aspect upon the facts stated, the complaint is legally sufficient (Howard Stores Corp. v Pope, 1 NY2d 110, 114). In deciding the motion, the copies of the Episcopal Mission Society (Society) manuals appended to the complaint must be considered part thereof (CPLR 3014).
Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that his employment with the Society began in 1967. In 1968,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Parker v. BorockNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Chin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Bowrin v. Catholic Guardian SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Gould v. Community Health Plan of Suffolk, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Sherman v. St. Barnabas HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.