Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 17, 2015No. 13-35624, 13-35631Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPregerson, Circuit Judge

Respectfully, I dissent from Section VI of the majority opinion which makes it harder to protect the threatened Canada Lynx and its critical habitat, and puts the species at increased risk. I do not agree with the majority that Thomas v. Peterson, 753 F.2d 754 (9th Cir.1985) (“Thomas ”), should be put into the shredder by inferring that Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008), and Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 561 U.S. 139, 130 S.Ct. 2743, 177 L.Ed.2d 461 (2010), implicitly “undermine the theoretical foundation for our prior…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Thomas v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Sierra Club v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API