Legal Opinion

Ruff v. City of Leavenworth, Kan.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 21, 1994No. 93-2243-JWLPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This case presents difficult issues implicating important competing public and individual interests. The plaintiffs, Gregory Ruff, Russell Wood, and Linda Sanders, are present or former members of the police department of the defendant City of Leavenworth (the “City”), headed by the Chief of Police, defendant Lee Doehring. They have instituted this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in an attempt to secure declaratory and injunctive relief for alleged violations of federal law. The thrust of their claim pertains to the City’s personnel policy…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Horstkoetter v. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Belch v. Jefferson CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
  4. Allen v. Bartholomew County Court Services DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API